8.1. Prehistory and causes of the Third World War:
There is a clear “declaration of war” on the part of Russia and China, but years after the hidden war had long since begun.
Every war tries to build up moments of surprise as strategic advantages and thus keeps on deceive and lie to the war opponent for as long as possible. Therefore, the preparations for war, with which every war begins, and the implementation of warlike activities must remain hidden from the enemy for as long as possible. Putin and his backers have succeeded very well in this, and the partly naïve “Western” politicians and governments have been deceived without developing any will to perceive, let alone the perception itself, which should have been much stronger on the basis of many developments. If one excludes a number of Eastern European, the Baltic states and even Russian critics of the Putin regime, it is still an enormous political failure
Every conflict and every war always had a history.
This prehistory is the great success of democratization in Russia and the world after liberalization under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, initially especially in the states of the former Soviet Union, which progressed increasingly and even took hold of Russia itself in the 1990s.
Putin was in Dresden, Germany, from 1985 to 1990 as an intelligence officer in the former “GDR”. He had thus been able to experience first-hand the power of the masses, who now organized regular demonstrations nationwide under the motto “we are the people”. Finally, the increasing freedom from anxiety of the many led to the fall of the few in the government and the East German state “GDR” ceased to exist. When Putin returned to Russia in 1990, it was not only theoretically clear to him what could happen when the freedom from anxiety of the masses of the people opposes the anxiety-mongers who govern them. Essential here is an uncontrolled, free communication between people, which made such a large community possible in the first place. Therefore, the globalization of communication through the various technologies of the Internet and the mobile phone with increasingly lower costs and the resulting possibility of creating a larger, initially uncontrollable and even increasingly global community (communio) is a very important factor. Only in this way could and can the community of the many oppose and even assert itself against the few of the powerful. The waves of democratization and their communication are at the center of the Third World War.
On December 26, 1991, according to the “Belovezh Agreements” of December 8, 1991, the last president of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, resigns and officially ends the former Soviet Union. This is followed by the “Commonwealth of Independent States” (15 states).
People are increasingly coming out of their anxiety-ridden apathy and daring to do something again. In Russia itself, a variety of newspapers and free media of different orientations are emerging. Stalin’s crimes were openly discussed, and people were outraged by the criminal structures in the communist era, under which all families except the rulers had to suffer. As early as 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev had proclaimed a “new way of thinking” and granted each socialist country the freedom to go its “own way”. Without massive military repression, the Eastern Bloc countries inclusive the former “GDR” (eastern Germany) were able to reshape their own political development. They chose democracy as their form of government (Poland, Czech-Slovakia (later Czechia and Slovakia), Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria), joined even later the European Union and NATO. East Germany united with West Germany to form a common state. The former Yugoslavia and the Balkans largely followed the same direction after major conflicts and wars, although Croatia is now also a member of the EU and NATO.
The long “age of anxiety” seemed to have been overcome! The “age of freedom of anxiety” seemed to have dawned.
If one wants to characterize this overall historical development taking into account what has been said so far, it is the increasing “decrease in anxiety” in these countries and the world.
That is the deep structure of historical development based in the human beeing.
However, this threatened the existence of those who needed fear to maintain their power if this development were to continue to spread, which could be assumed without massive and even warlike countermeasures.
While in the democracies people were still enthusiastic about the success of an increasing democratization of the world, perhaps even as if drunk, those whose existence was threatened by it, organized and found each other more and more in secret.
In Russia, the liberalization of the economy was already undermined in the last decade of the millennium with an increase in the criminal takeover of companies, assets and media, and the overall development went in the direction of an increasingly extreme kleptocracy, which increased enormously again in the 2000s after Putin came to power. Russia’s new billionaires did not want democratic control and transparency, and so the increasing instrumentalization of political goals already prevailed in the last decade of the last millennium. The accumulation of economic power in Russia, which took place mainly with people from or with connections of the Russian secret services, was intended to push back economic influence and connections to the West as unwelcome competition, because economic power also results in political power in the corresponding hands. Of course, the usual nationalist phrases such as “foreign infiltration”, “sell-out of one’s own economy and values”, etc. are political buzzwords here.
In this respect, it is important to understand that as early as the decade of 1990, an increasingly strong countermovement emerged in Russia, in which the criminal takeover of economic power was increasingly accompanied by the plans of the secret services to take over political power and then merge these two levels of power. The basic understanding of state action also includes the protection of the population from crime, in particular the protection of property. Under Putin, however, there is a fusion of these three major powers in Russia, so that criminality, economic and political power are brought together in one power apparatus. Crime requires what intelligence services specialize in, namely invisibility and lies as well as the deception of everyone else, at all levels and, of course, also at one’s own state level as well as in the international arena.
They are completely false analyses that assume that Putin’s policy or attitude has changed over the last 24 years since he came to power in 2000.
Equally wrong are all analyses that assume Russia’s state security interests as a basis of Putins politic as a “Western” explanatory pattern without asking themselves who this Russian state is supposed to be. This state has become the prey of the few in an increasingly perfected manipulation of the masses, which is kept under control by fear. Democracies must finally stop using their concepts of state, etc. in such analyses. These erroneous opinions naturally receive a lot of support and nourishment from the “narratives” of the autocrats. For example, Poland as a state did not lose its existence, nor was its existence threatened by Western states or was to be invaded and destroyed by the USA. Rather, it was the desire of the many to build democratic structures and to develop the economy and the state with more freedom, which means above all freedom from anxiety. In the end, no one forced Poland to join the EU and NATO. It is grotesque nonsense to doubt these voluntary decisions! It is equally grotesque nonsense to want to give Russia a say in the free decision of these states. It must be made clear that such arguments and thinking are clearly directed against the freedom of democratic states and then ultimately lead to what we in Ukraine have to painfully experience as a conventional war as part of a much bigger war in action. The lies and deceptions had had a good effect, while Western democracies could no longer imagine any other world than a democratic one.
Putin already had clear goals when he was installed as ruler in 2000, which were clearly directed against democracy as an opponent of the war:
Rather, the concentration of power of politics, business and crime in pushing back other actors and above all the free press became more and more successful, and one could thus let the veil of covert actions blow increasingly carefree. This was also the case with the invasion of Crimea in 2014, when soldiers without insignia occupied Crimea as part of Ukraine. It was only after the successful capture of Crimea that Putin later made fun of the “foreign idiots” who actually believed him that he did not know which people were involved in the warlike action.
Otto von Habsburg, one of the great European politicians, has already drawn attention in some speeches in 2003 to the fact that Putin had announced in a speech on January 19, 2000 in Minsk that he would double military spending in 5 years and make Russia a great power again. An aggressive speech with such goals, that apparently no one took note of, as the “Western” politics of the time lacked the will to perceive and a fundamental understanding of the events. Rather, despite the war crimes in Chechnya and devastating developments in Russia regarding press freedom and human rights, the red carpet continued to be rolled out for Putin, which has been so massively promoted.
The success of the democracy movement with the integration of almost all Eastern European states, later into the European Union and then into NATO, was a massive threat to the retention of power of the previous political, economic and criminal power of Russia’s secret services and its then appointed representative Putin. It is completely nonsensical to claim that Putin’s Russia felt threatened by NATO. Putin knew very well that he had nothing to fear militarily from NATO. This incredible nonsense is still being claimed!
Rather, his power and that of his backers was threatened by a successful democracy movement, which had to be fought in the very clear existential decision:
Either them or us! Both cannot survive at the same time!
Therefore, the decision to fight for existence is made much earlier than most people realized. Therefore, the war is being prepared for years and decades and strategies as well actions are being worked out on how this struggle for survival of power can be won by all means of the state, economic and criminal forces that are now merging.
The Third World War therefore begins with Putin’s seizure of power in 2000 with the announcement of the first preparations and objectives of the war (rearmament and restoration of Russia as a great power) with the speech on January 19, 2000 in Minsk.
In other words:
With Putin’s seizure of power in 2000, controlled by the secret services, the period of freedom from anxiety ends and the Third World War begins with the increasing development of the most important strategic weapon, which is now being used more and more: “anxiety”.
Anxiety generation internally and externally accompanies all concrete measures from the very beginning, such as criminal company takeovers through intimidation (mainly and first the important media companies), arrests and convictions, defamation and targeted murders in the free press with subsequent takeovers by obedient vassals, tightening of the laws, politically motivated condemnations of a controlled judiciary, murder of political opponents, election fraud, etc. and of course also through conventional wars, which are planned and carried out throughout Putin’s reign.
Since communist and dictatorial regimes know their main opponent, the human being in his individuality, exactly, their secret services and propaganda machines know exactly where his weaknesses lie.
By merging with crime, the corruption of the advantage of other statesmen and members of the government is sometimes a cheap means of damaging or completely eliminating democracy. Unfortunately, the German Chancellor Schröder and his later acceptance of high-paid posts in the Russian economy, with a still great influence in the SPD and the political landscape of Germany, does not play a laudable role here either. However, there is fighting at all levels and crime is also being promoted where it damages democracy as much as possible. The German company “Wirecard”, formerly with a market capitalization of up to 20 billion euros, went bankrupt due to a massive fraud in which the existence of about 2 billion euros was feigned on the balance sheets, causing billions of euros in damage to investors. In an extensive trial in Munich, Germany, under the direction of Judge Födisch, efforts are being made to clarify the situation. The German press refers to Western intelligence services, which attribute this criminal activity mainly to the former board member “Marsalek”. He was a Russian spy and had “controlled an agent ring in London” for years as well as built up an undisturbed spy network. Wirecard was designed “to obtain information and, on the other hand, to deliberately disrupt confidence in the financial market,” said Röttgen, a member of the German Bundestag. Marsalek, whose escape was probably organized by the Russian secret service, is still suspected to be in Russia.
Make Russia Great Again: From the beginning, Putin’s exercise of power was belligerent and aimed at creating anxiety among the population, so that he was able to win the elections as a strong man and savior of the nation. Anxiety generation in the state sphere internally (as well as externally) works best with an enemy to whom certain characteristics, deeds and intentions are attributed through lies, lying exaggerations and half-truths:
On September 8, 1999, an explosive charge destroyed an apartment block on Guryanov Street in the south of Moscow, killing 94 people. Four days later, an apartment block on Kashira Highway in Moscow was completely destroyed by an explosion, killing 119 people. Both attacks were staged by Vladimir Putin, according to German journalist Katrin Eigendorf and according to former FSB agent and dissident Alexander Litvinenko (later murdered). Among Western experts, the theory that the Russian secret service FSB was involved in the bomb attacks on residential buildings is advocated by David Satter, the former correspondent of the Financial Times in Moscow, in his book “Darkness at Dawn: the Rise of the Russian Criminal State” (Yale University Press). Also, according to research by French journalists Jean-Charles Deniau and Charles Gazelle, the explosions were detonated by the FSB to have a justification for the continuation of the Chechen war, which in turn helped Putin defeat the Communists in the presidential election on March 26, 2000.
Putin blamed Chechen terrorists for the bomb attacks and publicly declared war on them, which he calls an “anti-terrorist operation”.
Several Duma deputies, who later investigated the explosions, were murdered before a possible publication of results.
On October 7, 2006, Putin received a bloody birthday present: the elimination by the murder of a journalist critical of the Kremlin, Anna Politkovskaya, who (similar to Ukraine) had uncovered terrible human rights violations in the Chechen war.
On October 7, 2023, Putin received another bloody birthday present from Hamas, which brutally slaughtered over 1000 Jews and took hostages on his birthday.
The more brutal such measures are carried out, the more anxiety is generated. Diffuse anxiety no longer has an object and the creators of anxiety succeed in keeping the exact background in the dark, which is intended. However, it is also intended to build up clues and a diffuse symbolism that can be understood. In this respect, there is nothing to prove that these are “bloody birthday presents”, which is hereby clarified. But everyone can draw their own conclusions with knowledge of the facts and structures.
On April 16, 2009, Chechnya’s status as a “zone for the execution of anti-terrorist operations” was revoked and direct hostilities ended after the duo of Mevedev and Putin installed a government subservient to them.
Parallel to this war, the duo Medvedev (president) and Putin (prime minister) instigated the war in Georgia in 2008, whose democracy movement was already well advanced. Conflicts are fueled and then instrumentalized to create massive anxiety, including by military means.
After 5 days and several deaths, the conventional belligerent part of Russia’s anxiety-mongering was stopped, but the threat was issued that “one could strike again at any time” (Medvedev).
Georgia wanted to join NATO and the EU. Russia preempted this and blocked both possibilities with an open and smoldering conflict and still occupies the parts of Abkhazia and South Ossetia (about 20% of the country). The world’s second-largest oil pipeline runs through Georgia from Azerbaijan to the Turkish Mediterranean, which is of strategic importance.
2013: Once again, a state wants to become more democratic. This time it is Ukraine. In November 2013, the government of Ukraine, influenced by Putin, surprisingly declared that it would not sign the planned association agreement with the European Union. Immediately afterwards, mass protests broke out, leading to the flight of then-President Yanukovych to Russia in February 2014 and a new transitional government.
For Putin, as in East Germany, it is once again a development that makes it clear how dangerous democracy movements can be for those in power. The question of the existence of his rule arises again and with it the necessity to continue the war against democracy, which he had already won in his country at that time, now intensified. Ukraine must therefore not become a successful democratic country, as this would then have an impact on Russia and the war against democracy there.
In order to secure his hold on power, he occupied Crimea in March 2014 and annexed it on 18 March 2014. Here, too, Ukraine’s accession to NATO and the EU is now blocked and the fighting continues until, after another thorough and years-long preparation, he orders the major attack on Ukraine in February 2022.
While Putin had already succeeded in driving up the general anxiety in Russia until 2010 and thus oppressing the population more again, in another area of the world the magic of freedom from anxiety and thus of the love of truth, democracy and freedom flared up:
The Arab Spring or Arabellion stands for a series of protests, uprisings and revolutions in the Arab world at the beginning of the years from 2010 onwards.
Once again, it must have been shocking for rulers like Putin to see how popular uprisings in Tunisia led to the deposition and flight of the previous ruler “Ben Ali”.
This freedom from anxiety spread widely and so at the end of 2011 the president in Yemen resigned, in Libya the dictator “al-Gaddafi” was overthrown and in Egypt the “Day of Rage” began on January 25, 2011, whereby the previous President Mubarak resigned and assured free and democratic elections. On June 2nd, 2012, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. On February 4, 2011, there were major rallies by Palestinians in solidarity with the Egyptian demonstrators, especially in the Gaza Strip, where Hamas was in power. On February 14, the Palestinian government resigned and decided to hold new elections. Hamas immediately announced a boycott of the elections.
Previous dictators and rulers like Putin have become increasingly aware of where people’s freedom from anxiety can lead. In these examples, it became abundantly clear that this is an existential threat to autocrats that could be averted in Russia just in time.
Democracy, with its promise of freedom from fear and limitation of power, must thus be fought in the strongest possible way, which could only happen through an intensive war against every democratic movement at home and abroad and ultimately against all democracies.
However, this puts all democracies in the world at the centre of the armed conflict, because they also promote democratic conditions in other states.
Therefore, this is a world war of autocrats who have increasingly joined forces, and they are not isolated regional conflicts, as the so-called West and its sometimes naïve politicians and representatives, and even more so their societies, are led to believe.
In Syria, too, there were protests in 2011 that took to the streets for political freedoms and the overthrow of the government of “Bashar al-Assad”. However, a government reshuffle and the the following resignment could not calm them down, so that from mid-March 2011 onwards violent action was taken against demonstrators. In the middle of the year, the “Free Syrian Army” was formed from deserting soldiers and an ongoing civil war developed. From May 2013, Hezbollah, a group linked to Iran, supported the ruler “Assad” and when this did not seem sufficient, Russia also supported the ruler there from September 2015 with massive military operations, especially with air strikes. By the time Russia intervened, the ruler “Assad” had lost about 90% of the territory and was almost defeated. Russian brutality in the attacks on cities and civilian facilities such as schools and hospitals followed the same pattern as in Chechnya and was repeatedly criticized as serious human rights violations. Syria thus became a battlefield against a democracy movement that had initially begun peacefully, where many interests and also infiltrated terrorist groups, such as the Islamic State, prevented democracy from succeeding.
At the same time, the Russian air force bombed Aleppo in particular in such a way that tens of thousands were forced to flee towards Turkey and from there towards Germany. This was the beginning of a large refugee movement forced by this, which was mainly aimed at Germany. While there were about 33,000 Syrians living in Germany in 2011, this number rose to about 366,000 in 2015 and about 700,000 Syrians in 2016. The numbers rose to about 970,000 Syrians by 2023 and are now causing resentment and anxiety in German democracy.
The destabilization of democracies through streams of refugees is a clear intention of war against democracies in World War III.
It promotes precisely those anti-democratic forces that Putin wants to see in power in Western democracies in order to be able to attack and destabilize the democracies even better from within.
In July 2021, one of Putin’s closest allies, the Belarusian dictator Lukashenko, had openly and publicly threatened Europe, and Germany in particular, to “let through” en masse of refugees from countries such as Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq. The Poles strengthened their border protection after refugees from Iraq were actually recruited, flown to Minsk (Belarus) and then transported by Belarusian forces to the Polish border to cross the border.
At the latest through this not at all complete enumeration of historical facts, it is abundantly clear that the world war that has already begun against the democratic states is being waged on different levels and that all these different military measures serve the purpose of destabilizing and creating fear in the democracies.
The war aims are clear: to weaken existing democracies or democratic processes in states worldwide by bribing the rulers, exerting influence of all kinds, criminality, etc. and also through direct military measures such as in Africa, Gerogia and Ukraine, or to prevent them from implementing successful democratic structures, or to smash them and install rulers as in Chechnya or Hungary, that are easy to steer.
From Putin’s point of view, this would certainly include Trump, who publicly professes his support for Orban so massively and presents him as a role model. What a role model!
Economic warfare is an important part and of course also belongs to the total scope of military measures.
There are more and more reports that the corona virus came from the laboratory in Wuhan and not from the food market 300 meters away. Whether accident or intention, you will never know. In any case, this led to enormous distortions in the world and, through a radical separation of previously “just-in-time” supply chains, to an enormous increase in inflation. For about 2 years, this was inflation generated by the shortage of supply, which hit the democratic countries very hard. How this can be interpreted is not clear and remains hidden. What is clear, however, is that immediately after Corona, the war of aggression in Ukraine began and Russia saw itself in an excellent position to drive the now high inflation worldwide much higher by further restricting supply, especially in the gas and oil sector, in Europe, and thus inflicting massive damage on the economies of democracies.
The in years before created dependency traps on Russia and China have already partially sprung as a result.
In October 2022, inflation in Germany, which was particularly dependent, had risen to over 10 % as a result. A dramatic development, but far from the end of the economic war of the war opponents, who will not simply stop their attacks, but will continue them continuously.
The damage caused by the war opponents in the Third World War is already incredibly large. In the USA, instead of truthfully discussing the main causes of global inflation, Trump is using Biden alone to blame these upheavals in an incredibly perfidious way. Biden and Harris have done an incredible job of stabilizing the economy under these circumstances.
Further stabilisation was also achieved in Germany and Europe. But here, too, in France, for example, the right-wing nationalist party “rassemblement national”, which is inclined towards Putin, made the gains in the election with the argument that migration and inflation were too high and how bad the national situation and the previous government were.
Here, too, the underlying slogan is: “Make France great again” and “France first”.
The warmongers Russia in alliance with China, which supports Russia more and more openly, have clear warlike damage strategies and much of what they have set out to do has already worked.
The goals are already to a high extend realized through the two worldwide problems that they have largely caused to or at least intensified:
- Due to the creeping dependency trap built up over the years, the separation of dependence in supply chains and goods could trigger very strong inflation surges worldwide. This strategy will be pursued and expanded. However, now with more will to perceive the democracies, which will hopefully lead to further insights than before.
- Migration flows and smuggling on a very large scale, both targeted in Europe and supported by Venezuela in South America. Now not only Lebanon will be an additional source of migration.
Through these two major issues and a lot of other measures as for example covert measures such as the promotion of corruption by rulers like Orban through beautiful cooperation agreements in the billions, the global political upheavals in the democracies that they want, are already very clearly visible.
In the USA in particular, Trump has used the presentation of increased inflation and migration to create massive and unprecedented anxiety, thus bringing the intended anxiety creation of the war opponents of the democracies, i.e. the Third World War, into the middle of American society, massively dividing and damaging it.
At the same time, its ruinous economic concept is isolation and not cooperation with democratic countries.
With the support of Brexit and his lying friends Boris Johnson and Nigel Ferage under the bold and meaningless slogans “Take back control again”, to a certain extent also “Make Britain great again” and a “Britain first”, he has helped to ruin the country.
If you want to look at the catastrophic economic developments that can be expected in the USA under Trump, you don’t have to go far back in history.
One only has to look at the ruined economy of “Great Britain” to understand it as a model for future similar developments in the USA. These are facts!
It can only be repeated: If Trump, Johnson and Ferage and others had been Russian spies, they could not have produced a better result for Putin.
How Donald Trump can be trusted with even the slightest competence in economic issues is a mystery.
The lie that he bears even the slightest responsibility for the economic development in his presidency is grotesque.
If he did everything on his own, then the serious question must be asked what the economy did during it!
A president can set certain framework conditions, and that’s it. The economy then often develops better than expected despite adverse circumstances or a unhealthy higher deficit.
However, the fact that this time, with the envisaged radicalism of Trump/Vance, these framework conditions will have ruinous tendencies is more than to be expected and can be perceived in Britain as a model with gigantic damage.
The democracies must finally wake up! They have incredible strengths and are far superior to autocrats and dictators, as they bring the individual human beings and thus the state to development across all borders in outstanding cooperation.
As Kamala Harris has emphazised it: “Building strong alliances”. That is desperately needed, because Democracies will only be strong enough, if they cooperate.
The Third World War is far from lost. On the contrary. But there has to be finally a basic understanding of what the human being and what democracy is at its core and how they come to unfolding.
Driving people into a false realm of ideas by anxiety, thus depriving them of freedom from anxiety as the basis of democracy, is undemocratic and harmfull.
The fact that in the exaggerated alternative position of destruction or salvation in some people only the path of violence may appear as a possibility. This has nothing to do with democracy. What could have been learned from the storming of the Capitol?
The motivation and the understanding of the actors is still active, and Trump still drives people in this dispare of lack of alternatives. A lot of them are too much enclosed in their imagination and hardly reachable anymore for a democratic process.
All this is beneficial for the war opponents of democracy, but not for the USA as we still know it today.
Two additions should be added:
Global communication spreads news about the protests for more freedom via the Internet and mobile phones, so that in the wake of the new freedom from anxiety, protests also broke out in China on February 20, 2011, after calls on the Internet, which were crushed by the police and thugs. After the arrest of about 200 opponents of the regime and the blocking of search terms such as democracy on the Chinese Internet, the protests did not continue.
This proves how dangerous freedom of expression and communication is for autocrats. From teheir view,it must therefore also be discredited and prevented.
However, due to modern technology, it can no longer be completely switched off. Since then, China has also advanced the repression in this regard technically.
Xi Jinping became General Secretary of the Communist Party of China in 2012 and has been President of the People’s Republic of China since 2013. He also recognized that the reform and opening-up policy of Deng Xiaoping, i.e. his predecessor, endangered the party’s claim to power. This is followed by the elimination of his inner-party critics through corruption proceedings and an even more massive suppression of the people. The suppression of the protests in Hong Kong in 2019/2020 and an increasingly aggressive policy in the Taiwan question, as well as a massive rearmament in his time both internally and externally, are to be understood in clear lockstep with Putin.
Xi and Putin have met in person around forty times during Xi’s term in office. If you round this to ten years, that’s a personal visit every 3 months. It must therefore be assumed that they discuss and coordinate the policy of attack on the democratic states very precisely. In the case of China, the economic potential and the ability to be blackmailed from the creation of dependencies were now added as an additional war factor.
The creation of dependencies of any kind is a subtle way of creating anxiety. Because the separation from what is urgently needed, whether supply chains, raw materials, loans, etc. etc., brings existential problems in case of doubt and creates massive anxiety.
Since the presidential elections in Belarus in 2020 at the latest, the threat to Putin has been even clearer than it was before.
The previous ruler Lukashenko officially became president again with the alleged majority of votes through massive election manipulation. However, similar to Ukraine, there were large nationwide protests, where up to 100,000 people took to the streets.
Several thousand people were arrested and the opposition candidate, the likely winner of the election, finally had to flee the country.
On August 16, 2020, there was a protest march of about 200,000 people in Minsk, with a subsequent counterdemonstration for Lukashenko reaching around 3,000 people.
The protests in Iran after the death of Jina Mahsa Amini on September 16, 2022, which was brought about by the morality police, also encompassed a size that could only be suppressed with difficulty by those in power. Here, too, a greater freedom from anxiety flared up than those in power had suspected.
This may be enough evidence to make it clear how large the community of people worldwide has become who want to oppose the oppression of autocrats and dictators and demand democratization in the sense of freedom from anxiety, limitation of power, participation and co-determination as well as more justice.
To repeat it one last time: The prehistory of the “Third World War” is a democratization of this world from a new freedom from anxiety communicated to a growing community and the existential threat that arises from it for the dictatorial rulers, especially Russia, China, North Korea and Iran.
8.2 World War III
The war aims are clearly and openly formulated:
Western dominance in the world is to be broken so that China with its supporters Russia, North Korea and Iran are at the top of the world to the respective advantage of all parties involved and the previous “Western democracies” can no longer resist in severe damage and in strong dependency on dictatorially led states. To this end, further alliances are to be formed and useful conflicts, such as between Israelis and Palestinians, are to be stirred up, so that democracies at every level, i.e. not only militarily, are put on the defensive and ultimately defeated.
At the 2017 Communist Party Congress in China, Xi, who was confirmed as General Secretary, made it clear that China wants to break the dominance of the West. A stronger concentration of power on XI, a considerable rearmament and modernization of the military, a strong demarcation from democracies and nationalist propaganda were a clear declaration of fight, which can also be understood as a declaration of war. The later declarations and the formation of alliances in the BRICS states against the “West” also speak a clear language. Overall the sentence of Xi to Putin makes it very clear: “Both countries are in the concept of eternal friendship and mutual cooperation connected.”
Nobody should have any illusion about where China stands.
The idea that a war is fought only with physical weapons is no longer true today. People have been talking about hybrid warfare for some time now, meaning disinformation, influencing elections and opinions in opposing countries, mainly democracies, generating and controlling refugee flows, damage of other kinds via cybercrime, hacker attacks, etc., etc.
In addition to the concrete damage in each case, the focus of all measures is always on creating anxiety.
These are intended to bring about political decisions in other states that are favorable to one’s own strategy.
Since autocratic rulers also have to direct the masses of people they manage and get them behind them, the old means of creating anxiety are available. Therefore, the propaganda in Russia, China, North Korea and Iran is almost identical in orientation: The enemies are the “democracies” with their decadence and the problems discussed in these states, which are then enriched in the propaganda with exaggerations and lies. This external threat is used very much, especially in Russia, North Korea and Iran, in order to build up an external enemy, in order to create a common and solidary defense through this anxiety generation and, in the case of Russia, also to force men into a war that they would not wage if they had reported truthfully.
It is about redirecting the energy generated by anxiety at home to a common enemy that supposedly threatens the way of life, identity, opportunities for development and, more generally, the interests of the Russian, Iranian, North Korean and Chinese peoples.
The third world war is therefore led by a union of these 4 states, each of which has rigid, hierarchical power structures, through which they organize and coordinate oppression better and better, and thus the massive creation of anxiety continues to increase. The creation of anxiety always needs publicity (consistent murder of all “traitors” under Putin, public and disproportionate punishments in trials in all listed states, etc…. This is also the case with covert disinformation, i.e. disinformation that is unclear in its origin, or other measures that then generate its public impact. These techniques of power are used at home and abroad.
We must therefore state the following:
So, in these countries there is a minority of people who are mongering anxiety and a majority who are afraid.
Anxiety is broken down from a general abstraction to the small actions of an individual, so that individual freedom receives an unreal accessibility in the permanent shadow of this anxiety.
These specialists in the anxiety-mongering of these countries have coordinated their “warfare” on different levels and have most likely coordinated it very well, so that it is partly public and partly covert. The war is being waged at all levels, both with conventional weapons and with a maximum of anxiety-mongering, both internally and externally. As a war, it aims at the greatest possible damage to the other with mainly covert measures. The element of surprise in military measures is particularly important. The still strong opponent must be weakened covertly so that he is hardly able to defend himself in the final killing blow. This happens through all forms of direct and indirect damage, which also includes the expansion of economic dependencies (a special form of creating anxiety by threatening or carrying out the separation of dependencies – at best existential) and other strategic measures.
However, there can be no doubt:
We are not in a cold war that would be based on defensive deterrence, but in an extensive military worldwide conflict, which is being waged very strategically on many levels, in which it is a matter of maintaining power of those in power who see their existence threatened by the previous democracy movement and the democracies.
Like Louis XIV (1638-1715) in France, these rulers always regard the state and their own powerful existence as identical: “L’état, c’è moi” (I am the state).
The fact that the population wants liberation from precisely these rulers was seen in the protest movements in Russia more and more weakend until the decade even after 2010, which received an indescribably poor response in the “West”.In China and in Iran similar waves of protests are known. Nothing is known about North Korea here, but it can be assumed that the people are structurally indistinguishable from others and also strive for political freedom from anxiety and democracy.
This is unlikely to have changed to this day and it makes it very clear:
The deep structure of history, which is that of man, goes in a different direction. People around the world are structured in the same way. They suffer from lack of freedom and anxiety, that arises from it as a coming in mind of separation.
The war against the worldwide freedom from anxiety and the democracies based on it has an extremely weak basis and the more the various oppressive mechanisms of one’s own population have to be expanded for the conduct of war, the more lies and cover-ups have to be made, the weaker the basis for one’s own war becomes. The question is, if the Democracies develop the will of perception, a clear thinking free of anxieties and so a very strong will, to defend themselves, what includes the complete victory of Ukraine with the withdrawal of Russia from the state of Ukraine.
